<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Pssstt… Your Ad Group Structure Is Killing Your Campaign!</title> <atom:link href="http://promotedprofits.com/ad-group-management-how-to-structure-ad-groups-and-increase-ctr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://promotedprofits.com/ad-group-management-how-to-structure-ad-groups-and-increase-ctr</link> <description>Internet Marketing Strategy, News, Reviews</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:21:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: amer</title><link>http://promotedprofits.com/ad-group-management-how-to-structure-ad-groups-and-increase-ctr/comment-page-1/#comment-30866</link> <dc:creator>amer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 15:00:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://promotedprofits.com/?p=76#comment-30866</guid> <description>Hi
Can you give me a quote to set up my campaign
Thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br
/> Can you give me a quote to set up my campaign<br
/> Thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Russell</title><link>http://promotedprofits.com/ad-group-management-how-to-structure-ad-groups-and-increase-ctr/comment-page-1/#comment-8892</link> <dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 13:48:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://promotedprofits.com/?p=76#comment-8892</guid> <description>Bryan,
I used your tip but I am finding the same issue with Adgroup ie 2.
Google won&#039;t show my phrase match keywords since it is also a negative.  I even set the match as an negative exact match under the negative keywords list.  What am I missing?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan,<br
/> I used your tip but I am finding the same issue with Adgroup ie 2.<br
/> Google won&#8217;t show my phrase match keywords since it is also a negative.  I even set the match as an negative exact match under the negative keywords list.  What am I missing?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Annette</title><link>http://promotedprofits.com/ad-group-management-how-to-structure-ad-groups-and-increase-ctr/comment-page-1/#comment-8296</link> <dc:creator>Annette</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:35:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://promotedprofits.com/?p=76#comment-8296</guid> <description>Hi Bryan,
Loved your article above - thanks heaps.  Please excuse my ignorance at the following question but I&#039;ve been looking on line for the answer and can&#039;t find it anywhere.
Question:
If someone searchs for say - cocktail machines
and your campaign has  [cocktail machines]             - exact match
&quot;cocktail machines&quot;  &amp;        - phrase match
cocktail machines             - broad match
would it be correct in saying that (assuming quality score was the same) the [exact match] keyword would have its ad displayed?
Secondly, would all three keywords incur an impression?  If the answer is yes, is this why you use the negative exact matches when setting up the adgroup using &quot;phrase matches&quot;  as you mentioned above.
Lastly, my campaign was originally set up by a friend who at that time knew more than I did (i knew nothing). He left the content network on (incurring lots of impressions) and didn&#039;t use any negative keywords.  As I now know a lot more, I have made changes but 6 months of impressions have accruded.  Should I continue with my current campaign (some of my keywords with high volumne impressions have a CTR of between 7 - 13% while low volumne specific keywords range from 30-50%)   or should I start from scratch and do it right from the beginning?
Any help would be kindly received, as the more I learn the less I realize that I know!
Kind regards
Annette</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bryan,<br
/> Loved your article above &#8211; thanks heaps.  Please excuse my ignorance at the following question but I&#8217;ve been looking on line for the answer and can&#8217;t find it anywhere.<br
/> Question:<br
/> If someone searchs for say &#8211; cocktail machines<br
/> and your campaign has  [cocktail machines]             &#8211; exact match<br
/> &#8220;cocktail machines&#8221;  &amp;        &#8211; phrase match<br
/> cocktail machines             &#8211; broad match<br
/> would it be correct in saying that (assuming quality score was the same) the [exact match] keyword would have its ad displayed?<br
/> Secondly, would all three keywords incur an impression?  If the answer is yes, is this why you use the negative exact matches when setting up the adgroup using &#8220;phrase matches&#8221;  as you mentioned above.</p><p>Lastly, my campaign was originally set up by a friend who at that time knew more than I did (i knew nothing). He left the content network on (incurring lots of impressions) and didn&#8217;t use any negative keywords.  As I now know a lot more, I have made changes but 6 months of impressions have accruded.  Should I continue with my current campaign (some of my keywords with high volumne impressions have a CTR of between 7 &#8211; 13% while low volumne specific keywords range from 30-50%)   or should I start from scratch and do it right from the beginning?</p><p>Any help would be kindly received, as the more I learn the less I realize that I know!</p><p>Kind regards<br
/> Annette</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bryan</title><link>http://promotedprofits.com/ad-group-management-how-to-structure-ad-groups-and-increase-ctr/comment-page-1/#comment-6326</link> <dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:14:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://promotedprofits.com/?p=76#comment-6326</guid> <description>Hi Richard,
Thanks for you comment.  I certainly could definitively prove to you that this works, but as we all know - time is money.  So let me just give an expanded explanation.
This is using negative keywords on an adgroup level.  Here were saying to Google that when this ad group is triggered, do not trigger it for any exact match keywords.  Rather trigger our other ad group that has exact match keywords. It&#039;s a simple concept and it works.
To say this doesn&#039;t work would mean that Google doesn&#039;t following their own match types.  Unlikely.  Plus, I have definitive proof that it does in fact work and it works well.
Have you tried this.  Perhaps you got the structure wrong?
Either  way, thanks for you comment and thanks for stopping by.
Cheers,
Bryan</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard,</p><p>Thanks for you comment.  I certainly could definitively prove to you that this works, but as we all know &#8211; time is money.  So let me just give an expanded explanation.</p><p>This is using negative keywords on an adgroup level.  Here were saying to Google that when this ad group is triggered, do not trigger it for any exact match keywords.  Rather trigger our other ad group that has exact match keywords. It&#8217;s a simple concept and it works.</p><p>To say this doesn&#8217;t work would mean that Google doesn&#8217;t following their own match types.  Unlikely.  Plus, I have definitive proof that it does in fact work and it works well.</p><p>Have you tried this.  Perhaps you got the structure wrong?</p><p>Either  way, thanks for you comment and thanks for stopping by.</p><p>Cheers,<br
/> Bryan</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard</title><link>http://promotedprofits.com/ad-group-management-how-to-structure-ad-groups-and-increase-ctr/comment-page-1/#comment-6324</link> <dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:25:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://promotedprofits.com/?p=76#comment-6324</guid> <description>Example Ad Group #2 - this doesn&#039;t work, just try it. Google rates your keywords on exact terms, quality score etc. Putting in exact negative for phrase match keywords will stop them showing. Nice idea but not sure itworks like that please prove me wrong.
You should NEVER use broad match. ITrue in some senses but you will never know what a person might type in. You need to use keyword tools, google insight, trends and other tools.
I would start to steer away from broad match but never use it is bad advice. (unless you know every possible variation of keyword that some could type in.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Example Ad Group #2 &#8211; this doesn&#8217;t work, just try it. Google rates your keywords on exact terms, quality score etc. Putting in exact negative for phrase match keywords will stop them showing. Nice idea but not sure itworks like that please prove me wrong.</p><p>You should NEVER use broad match. ITrue in some senses but you will never know what a person might type in. You need to use keyword tools, google insight, trends and other tools.<br
/> I would start to steer away from broad match but never use it is bad advice. (unless you know every possible variation of keyword that some could type in.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scott</title><link>http://promotedprofits.com/ad-group-management-how-to-structure-ad-groups-and-increase-ctr/comment-page-1/#comment-2114</link> <dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:38:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://promotedprofits.com/?p=76#comment-2114</guid> <description>Hi Brian,
I am just starting to create an adwords campaign for one of my niche lawyer sites. I can\&#039;t tell you how glad I was to find your blog post. Your post absolutely answered the question I had.
I do have one more question, if you don\&#039;t mind.
Should the keyword phrase \&quot;nashville dui lawyer\&quot; &amp; \&quot;nashville dui attorney\&quot; have their own separate ad groups? The only difference is the word \&quot;lawyer\&quot; vs. \&quot;attorney\&quot;?
Thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brian,</p><p>I am just starting to create an adwords campaign for one of my niche lawyer sites. I can\&#8217;t tell you how glad I was to find your blog post. Your post absolutely answered the question I had.</p><p>I do have one more question, if you don\&#8217;t mind.</p><p>Should the keyword phrase \&quot;nashville dui lawyer\&quot; &amp; \&quot;nashville dui attorney\&quot; have their own separate ad groups? The only difference is the word \&quot;lawyer\&quot; vs. \&quot;attorney\&quot;?</p><p>Thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bryan</title><link>http://promotedprofits.com/ad-group-management-how-to-structure-ad-groups-and-increase-ctr/comment-page-1/#comment-856</link> <dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 01:50:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://promotedprofits.com/?p=76#comment-856</guid> <description>Hi Michelle,
Thanks for your comment.  As to your question, I can definitely see the value in that strategy.  But as far as practicality (in terms of time and effort worth doing that) you would want to identify which keywords are actually worth doing it for first.
This strategy is similar.  First I do this, then if I notice one keyword is performing exceptionally well, I do pull it out and put it in it&#039;s own ad group.  The keyword doesn&#039;t lose it&#039;s history and you can even further laser target.  Understand?
In marketing, it&#039;s all a factor of finding out what&#039;s worth doing the quickest possible with the littlest effort.  Once you identify it, then you go full speed ahead.  Speed, efficiency, effectiveness.
Glad you enjoyed the article and there&#039;s lots more to come.
Cheers,
Bryan</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michelle,</p><p>Thanks for your comment.  As to your question, I can definitely see the value in that strategy.  But as far as practicality (in terms of time and effort worth doing that) you would want to identify which keywords are actually worth doing it for first.</p><p>This strategy is similar.  First I do this, then if I notice one keyword is performing exceptionally well, I do pull it out and put it in it&#8217;s own ad group.  The keyword doesn&#8217;t lose it&#8217;s history and you can even further laser target.  Understand?</p><p>In marketing, it&#8217;s all a factor of finding out what&#8217;s worth doing the quickest possible with the littlest effort.  Once you identify it, then you go full speed ahead.  Speed, efficiency, effectiveness.</p><p>Glad you enjoyed the article and there&#8217;s lots more to come.</p><p>Cheers,<br
/> Bryan</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michelle</title><link>http://promotedprofits.com/ad-group-management-how-to-structure-ad-groups-and-increase-ctr/comment-page-1/#comment-855</link> <dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 01:42:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://promotedprofits.com/?p=76#comment-855</guid> <description>By the way where is your Affiliate Lab Formula 2.0? system? I couldn&#039;t find it! :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way where is your Affiliate Lab Formula 2.0? system? I couldn&#8217;t find it! <img
src='http://promotedprofits.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michelle</title><link>http://promotedprofits.com/ad-group-management-how-to-structure-ad-groups-and-increase-ctr/comment-page-1/#comment-853</link> <dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 01:38:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://promotedprofits.com/?p=76#comment-853</guid> <description>Hi Bryan,
I have found your article very interesting and will put it in action ASAP! My question is What do you think about the strategy of puting ONLY one keyword match type per adgroup? Will this really make your ads more targeted?
I just read this before landing into your page and was wondering what do you think about this, since your strategy have multiple keywords (same match type) in one adgroup.
Thank you for sharing your knowlege with us!
Saludos!
Michelle</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bryan,<br
/> I have found your article very interesting and will put it in action ASAP! My question is What do you think about the strategy of puting ONLY one keyword match type per adgroup? Will this really make your ads more targeted?</p><p>I just read this before landing into your page and was wondering what do you think about this, since your strategy have multiple keywords (same match type) in one adgroup.</p><p>Thank you for sharing your knowlege with us!</p><p>Saludos!<br
/> Michelle</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bryan</title><link>http://promotedprofits.com/ad-group-management-how-to-structure-ad-groups-and-increase-ctr/comment-page-1/#comment-652</link> <dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 04:43:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://promotedprofits.com/?p=76#comment-652</guid> <description>Hi Lauren,
I&#039;m not entirely clear on what you mean but I&#039;ll try to answer your question.  When you&#039;re using Editor, there a couple different way to get keywords into the system.
1. The add multiple keywords box
2. The csv import feature
If we assume you&#039;re using option 1, then you simply do this:
1. Add exact match in editor format (no negatives) needed
2. Add phrase match in editor format, and in the same box add you negative exacts in just regular negative exact match format, ie:
phrasematchkeyword,editor,format, here
phrasematchkeyword,editor,format, here
phrasematchkeyword,editor,format, here
-[exact match keyword]
-[exact match keyword]
It will then add you phrase match keywords to the adgroup specified as well the negative exact match keywords to that ad group as well.
I think this should answer your question, but just in case, I&#039;ll mark it down to do a Promoted Video on the process.
Thanks for commenting, and perhaps you may like &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://promotedprofits.com/how-a-special-forces-sniper-would-start-every-adwords-campaign/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How Snipers would Set Up an Adwords Campaign&lt;/a&gt;.  It goes hand in hand with this.
Cheers,
Bryan</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lauren,</p><p>I&#8217;m not entirely clear on what you mean but I&#8217;ll try to answer your question.  When you&#8217;re using Editor, there a couple different way to get keywords into the system.</p><p>1. The add multiple keywords box<br
/> 2. The csv import feature</p><p>If we assume you&#8217;re using option 1, then you simply do this:</p><p>1. Add exact match in editor format (no negatives) needed</p><p>2. Add phrase match in editor format, and in the same box add you negative exacts in just regular negative exact match format, ie:</p><p>phrasematchkeyword,editor,format, here<br
/> phrasematchkeyword,editor,format, here<br
/> phrasematchkeyword,editor,format, here<br
/> -[exact match keyword]<br
/> -[exact match keyword]</p><p>It will then add you phrase match keywords to the adgroup specified as well the negative exact match keywords to that ad group as well.</p><p>I think this should answer your question, but just in case, I&#8217;ll mark it down to do a Promoted Video on the process.</p><p>Thanks for commenting, and perhaps you may like &#8220;<a
href="http://promotedprofits.com/how-a-special-forces-sniper-would-start-every-adwords-campaign/" rel="nofollow">How Snipers would Set Up an Adwords Campaign</a>.  It goes hand in hand with this.</p><p>Cheers,<br
/> Bryan</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
